2 edition of framework for the selection of family planning program evaluation topics found in the catalog.
framework for the selection of family planning program evaluation topics
by Division of Social and Administrative Sciences, International Institute for the Study of Human Reproduction, Columbia University in New York
Written in English
Includes bibliographical references.
|Statement||by Jack Reynolds.|
|Series||Manuals for evaluation of family planning and population programs ;, 1|
|LC Classifications||HQ763.5 .R48|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||47 p. :|
|Number of Pages||47|
|LC Control Number||76378672|
Program Design Monitoring and Evaluation (PDME) of Family Planning Programs A Training Manual for Program Managers Child Survival Technical Support Plus (CSTS+) ORC Macro Calverton, Maryland, USA. Save the Children Westport, Connecticut, USA. September (revised ). planning and management. Monitoring helps project managers and staff to conceptual framework for monitoring and evaluation of AD projects in the region. Lessons and experiences have been drawn from past development efforts in the region. It is, then, followed by .
To date, there are no publications demonstrating how a logic model framework can be used for evaluation and program planning in a primary care PBRN. The purpose of this article is to describe the development of a logic model and how the framework has been used in a primary care PBRN, the South Texas Ambulatory Research Network (STARNet). Describes planning in social welfare organizations. This chapter focuses on the three types of planning generally undertaken by organization managers: program planning and evaluation, operational planning, and strategic or long-term planning for the organization’s future growth and development. Checkoway, Barry.
Purpose and Intent of the Journal Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and. By , that number was , and by , it had plummeted to Clearly, Americans had to have been practicing family planning. Over the course of the 19th century, contraception was discussed in wider circles in America than ever before. Puritan ideas did not disappear, but other ideas .
Synopses of reported decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in which Judge Robert Heron Bork authored a signed opinion or other statement, 1982-1987
Psychrometer Calculator ML-322/UM
A drive across Africa
George D. Herron and the European settlement.
Issues in accounting education.
Technical Evaluation Report on the Eletromagnetic Wave Propagation Panel Symposium on Propgation Effects on Military Systems in the High Latitude Region.
Model personnel rules and regulations
Mapping animal and human transformations
crisis of American federalism
The wonder, a woman keeps a secret
possibilities of a maple sugar industry in western North Carolina
Saints by calling: or Called to be saints
Sheppards dealers in collectables
The Euclidean woman
Author(s): Reynolds,J Title(s): Toward a framework for the selection of family planning program evaluation topics, priorities and measures/ J. Reynolds. Publisher: Description: 49 p. Title(s): A framework for the selection of family planning program evaluation topics/ by Jack Reynolds. Edition: Rev.
Country of Publication: United States Publisher: [New York: Division of Social and Administrative Sciences, International Institute for the Study of Human Reproduction], Author(s): Reynolds,J Title(s): A framework for the selection of family planning program evaluation topics/ J.
Reynolds. Country of Publication: United States Publisher: N.Y., Internation Institute for the Study of Human Reproduction., 1.
Author(s): Reynolds,J Title(s): A framework for the selection of family planning program evaluation topics/ J. Reynolds. Country of Publication: United States Publisher: New York, Columbia University, International Institute for the Study of Human Reproduction, Augustrevised edition, Description: 47 p.
A framework for the selection of family planning program evaluation topics. Manuals for Evaluation of Family Planning and Population Programs, No. New York: Division for Program Development and Evaluation, International Institute for the Study of Human Reproduction, Columbia by: Purpose: To provide a comprehensive listing of the most widely used indicators for evaluating family planning programs in developing countries.
The specific objectives of the handbook are: (1) to differentiate the levels for which family planning evaluation indicators are needed (program versus population level); (2) to compile in a single volume those indicators judged most useful in family planning program evaluation.
The indicators are organized according to the conceptual framework developed under the EVALUATION project. The specific objectives of this Handbook are: to differentiate the levels for which family planning indicators are needed (program versus population level); to compile those indicators judged most useful in family planning program evaluation into a single volume; to provide a definition of these indicators to enchance the consistent use of terms across programs.
family planning services, ensuring a continuous supply of family planning commodities at health facilities, and monitoring and evaluating theinterventions.
The PROGRESS project activities fall under the “Investing in people” component of the Foreign Assistance Framework. The FHI technical assistance strategy is focused on building capacity. Welcome to the programmatic area on family planning (FP) core indicators within MEASURE Evaluation’s Family Planning and Reproductive Health Indicators Database.
This is one of the subareas found in the family planning section of the database. All indicators for this area include a definition, data requirements, data source(s), purpose, issues and—if relevant—gender implications.
India was the first country in the world to have launched a National Programme for Family Planning in Over the decades, the programme has undergone transformation in terms of policy and actual programme implementation and currently being repositioned to not only achieve population stabilization goals but also promote reproductive health and reduce maternal, infant & child mortality and.
It is written for the educational specialist or person responsible for the educational services of a family planning program. The manual is intended only as a general framework for planning.
It is, however, specific enough to provide direction in charting an educational plan and in taking some beginning steps toward its implementation. Persons with limited evaluation experience often are bewildered by the process of selecting indicators.
The following criteria were used to select indicators included in this database: Relevance: There is a clear relationship between the indicator and FP/RH. This chapter presents information on family planning worldwide, a profile of Haiti,fertility and family planning in Haiti, family planning initiatives, and the Social Ecological Framework.
Sectionfamily planning worldwide, provides a brief backgroundon how family plan ning is. The findings from this evaluation provide evidence that complex HIV counseling messages can be implemented in family planning programs in Tanzania, and potentially in other countries that are considering how to better integrate HIV risk messages into family planning counseling.
In its broadest meaning, to evaluate means to ascertain the worth of or to fix a value on some object.
In this book, we use evaluation in a more restricted sense, as program evaluation or interchangeably as evaluation research, defined as a social science activity directed at collecting, analyzing, interpreting, and communicating information about the.
Effective program evaluation is a systematic way to improve and account for public health actions by involving procedures that are useful, feasible, ethical, and accurate. The Framework for Evaluation in Public Health  guides public health professionals in their use of program evaluation. It is a practical, nonprescriptive tool, designed to.
Books shelved as family-planning: Cribsheet: A Data-Driven Guide to Better, More Relaxed Parenting, from Birth to Preschool by Emily Oster, Expecting Bet. Welcome to the programmatic area on repositioning family planning (FP) within MEASURE Evaluation’s Family Planning and Reproductive Health Indicators Database.
Repositioning FP is one of the subareas found in the family planning section of the database. All indicators for this area include a definition, data requirements, data source(s), purpose, issues and—if relevant—gender implications.
Access to safe, voluntary family planning is a human right. Family planning is central to gender equality and women’s empowerment, and it is a key factor in reducing poverty. Yet in developing regions, an estimated million women who want to avoid pregnancy are not using safe and effective family planning methods, for reasons ranging from lack of access to information or services to lack.
assess program outcomes. The Evaluation Process There are three phases to an evaluation (represented graphically in Figure 1): • evaluation assessment or framework (the planning phase); • evaluation study; and • decision-making based on findings and recommendations.
The evaluation assessment phase identifies the main issues and. rights and family planning. Limitations of this re-search: Adolescents may not demonstrate measurable behavioral results until well after the end of the program or evaluation, so successful interventions may be missed in the literature.
Also, few adolescent-focused initiatives are specifically defined as “family planning” programs.Framework for Program Evaluation. 1. Citation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR ;48() 1. Summary. Effective program evaluation is a systematic way to improve and account for program actions involving methods that are useful, feasible, ethical, and accurate.planning and implementing the evaluation, and and to help to formulate better program services, evaluation questions and approaches.
This process may involve topic/intervention in different lights, as well as generate investment in the program development process.